Mayfield tornado rating reddit. 202 votes, 29 comments.

Mayfield tornado rating reddit That tornado was almost given an EF5 rating but there were some issues with some buildings and houses that prevented such a The asinine thing is that probably no tornado of the past that got a EF/F5 rating would be given it today with how insane they are with rating the DI’s. The last EF4 tornado to strike the U. The issue is there probably isn't a community in West KY that didn't take some damage from the multiple waves of severe weather. a total loss is a total loss, no matter if a foundation slab is covered in 2. As a result it unfortunately impacted some newly built structures that should've been built to the latest code. During the late evening of Friday, December 10, 2021, a violent, long-tracked and devastating EF4 tornado, sometimes referred to as the Western Kentucky tornado, [3] Mayfield tornado, [4] or The Beast, [5] moved across Western Kentucky, United States, producing severe-to-catastrophic damage in numerous towns, including Mayfield, Princeton, Dawson Springs, and Bremen. Therefore we can only say with certainty that it was capable of causing EF-3 damage. It seems like this hypocrisy exists in this sub of caring about the tornadoes and the damage but also not daring to step aside from the acceptable lines that the It’s highly likely that many f4/ef4 tornadoes have had instances of f5/ef5 intensity. The trees that lined the interstate from my area all the way to Mayfield (and for many miles past, it seemed like that tornado literally followed the four lane highway through the area) were all broken and it remains a wasteland. The long-track tornado traveled an astounding 165. The tornado's path was similar to the Mayfield tornado but at times was a couple miles north of it, which did help keep it out of population centers. Tornadoes do not show uniform damage in locations like this, even maxed out tornadoes like we saw on 4/27 showed pretty inconsistent damage next to extreme EF5 level damage. Again, not a commentary on this tornado but more in generally. I’ve seen dozens of tornadoes I knew were F-5 if it were based on wind speed, that were under rated because of simply what they impacted. with calculated winds of 294 mph. These slabs aren’t wiped clean, so it is definitively not an EF5 by the evidence seen so far. It took a full decade for another tornado with a death toll above 50 to occur in the US from 2011 to 2021 with the Mayfield tornado claiming 57 lives. I personally think a tornado like H-PC or Mayfield. However, the F4 rating stands. so there is gonna be some random overlap There also seems to be a bias among surveyors to not label a tornado an EF5. Mayfield was terrifying because you could only see it when there was lightning. The Granville-Utica Illinois F3 tornado on April 20th, 2004. that goes into something like the Emmerson method). Far too many people have been killed in this devastating tragedy. For instance, the Mayfield tornado lifted around it's crossing of the Mississippi River and again right after impacting Mayfield. This tornado was significant in the fact of the extreme damage that it caused in Utica, and 8 people were killed. Everything below an EF3 is rated by a meteorologist at the local levelthey have no engineering degree and do the best they can with the training they receive. Look homie idk if this question really has a good answer. Go to a magic the gathering subreddit and say you think some cards need to be banned or, go to the tornado subreddit and say you think a tornado should be EF5 or the EF rating should be changed. Nous parlons en anglais et en français. Three years ago, an EF-4 tornado tore through several Kentucky counties, killing 24 people in Graves County alone and damaging thousands of structures. there are a few tornadoes i can think of in the past 10 years that very likely reached 200+ mph winds, like rolling fork or mayfield, but there just wasn't a building in the way when it hit that point. After that, we got the EF scale, and the last EF5-rated tornado was 2013 Newcastle-Moore. I believe Ernie Ostuno argued this tornado for an F5 rating. Also, the F5 rating for Woldegk is unofficial. The correlation coefficient return for debris fallout from Mayfield and Benton was covering an area of 600 square miles. If they rated the Mayfield tornado an EF0 nothing would change aside from the data having a misleading level of impact. Jarrell was estimated at 260 MPH. The wind estimates for the Mayfield tornado were 190 MPH. If a tornado has an EF5 category damage There are several F5s under the old F scale that would probably be ranked as EF4s and in some cases EF3s while the opposite would happen with some EF4s and maybe some F3s getting F5 ratings. I’m not an expert of course, but all the information coming out - a debris spike, debris lofted 30-40,000+ feet, debarked trees, indicates this was a very strong tornado right as it Just goes to show the size of a tornado has nothing to do with its strength. Bassfield 2020 was probably the closest recent tornado to get an EF5 rating All in all, there's a lot of recency-bias for this question and I'm not sure a single person that has tracked tornadoes since 2013 would agree with Rolling Forks or Matador being the closest EF5 since Moore 2013. In particular, the video from the Limestone Correctional Facility is one of the most terrifying tornado videos ever recorded. In Mayfield though, there appears to be more EF3/EF4 damage but in Dawson Springs however that will ultimately determine that it’s an EF5. 50+ dead from Mayfield tornado. It just that either when they cause damage that intensity isn’t consistent or that level of intensity is out in open country and doesn’t affect anyone. It looks like a nuclear bomb was dropped wherever the tornado went through. If a violent tornado occurs outside of civilization and it doesn’t cause any significant damage, it’s unlikely to get a very high rating. A car is not a well-built structure. Share All about tornadoes! Discord The Windsor, CO EF4 was quietly downgraded to a 3 (as was the Holly, CO tornado) they said the Windsor tornado had winds 1 mph too slow to be an EF4, I'm not making that up. An EF5 tornado is the strongest designation a tornado can receive. Each tornado is rated on size, destruction, vortices, satellite tornadoes, length of path, amount of damage, and number of deaths. Whether you agree with the rating or not, remember to be… Forgotten Violent Tornadoes PT31: May 19 2013, Shawnee-Lake Thunderbird EF4 Tornado r/tornado • still full of adrenaline from my first tornado warning experience Under the old Fujita Scale, a number of the tornadoes we've seen in the last decade would have made F5 rating largely on raw strength alone Nope, that's wrong. It seems that this is happening in tornado rating classification. They are so violent that they are visually stronger, just look at this clip from Moore's 1999 tornado tell me a tornado currently that looks like this. 255 votes, 50 comments. Even the old Fujita scale rated tornadoes on the basis of damage. Finally, the Mayfield tornado was rated at 190 mph, so just below EF5 strength. I think it’s important for people who are surprised when a very bad, obviously very damaging tornado doesn’t get an EF4+ rating — and it’s a case with an extensive, observable damage path like the Oklahoma storms, not something like El Reno — to remember that a tornado with EF3 wind speeds is dangerous, damaging, and capable of Whereas El Nino typically wakes up the standard tornado Alley and Gulf Coast areas. They use an app that tells them where a rating should start at based on the degree of damage. 18 votes, 13 comments. The EF scale only measures the damages that a tornado leaves behind, with human structures at the center of the rating system. It was an EF4 yet killed 70+ people and leveled two towns. There's rumors of political and insurance interference, there's rumors saying that there's a directive to never rate a home as EF5 and to top them out at some nws wanted the tornado to be rated F3 in the past so just hearing that would likely be rated EF4 , Mayfield broke 2-3 concrete slabs while moving more then 55+ mph in forward speed , NWS stated that goldsby and Blanchard EF4 rating were the same strength of bridge creek 1999 , meaning it would only be rated strong EF4 today The strongest tornadoes having the highest ratings is important for data, and not much else. It only takes one EF-5 damage indicator for the tornado to be rated that. /sarcasm Posted by u/XxCozmoKramerxX - 160 votes and 50 comments There is a solid reason as to why that rating talk occurred—whenever the SPC issues a mesoscale discussion for an ongoing tornado with specific wording "strong to intense," they are disseminating legitimate pre-rating based on known parameter comparison (TDS height, Vrot, etc. Probably only Jarrel would be given the EF5 rating and even then they’d likely say something like “Due to the low forward motion of the storm we have assessed that most damage came from Because the technology for directly rating the power of a tornado does not exist. There was/is no way to reliably measure tornado speeds. It’s just discourse and the average person doesn’t care about tornado rating (General American populace). If the tornado happened in the woods and it didn't hit a home you can only work with that. I will trust the person who tweeted it as they are very experienced, but I do have some doubts about this one as well. Barnersville was estimated at 175 MPH not 205-317 MPH. Since the Moore Ef5 of 2013 there have been a few tornadoes we’ve seen that have swept away building that had anchor bolts and yet only get a high end Ef4 rating by the NWS. Weaker tornadoes with 100+ MPH winds do not “completely damage” American towns, as seen in Brandenburg and Sulphur and Rogers. From what I can deduce from my own observations, most long track tornadoes like that lift and cycle several times. Parts of a driveway were scoured near a bare foundation. Lubbock Texas F6 It was estimated between 300 and 318 mph It is also one of the only tornadoes to get the rating of F6 which was the inconceivable tornado It was later downgraded to F5 when the new scale came out. Any historical tornado that’s claimed to be an EF 4 or EF5 from Europe is false. As a compromise, the NWS occasionally uses what they call "non-damage indicators", like vehicles and the concrete curbs in Joplin, to guide their ratings. The Hackleburg - Phil Campbell Tornado exemplifies EF-5 tornadoes at their very worst. The atmospheric condition simply don’t exist. Same here. The sheer lack of understanding of how ratings scales work here is ridiculous. I live somewhat close to where the Quad State/Mayfield tornado traveled. it’s stupid Remains of 500,000-gallon water tower after being struck by a tornado, Mayfield Kentucky 12/5/2021 No rating on it yet, but preliminary indications based on the I personally think the NWS enhanced fujita scale needs a complete scap and rework and a new rating systems and factor in wind speed along with damage and give a set rating from again F-0 all the way to at least F-10 being the max why you might ask let's look at the El Reno tornado that particular twister had over 300+ wind speed and a very high I think Mayfield is really the only tornado that should’ve been an EF5 based on my earthquake-engineering focused structural engineering intuition. to infer the wind speeds required for such damage to occur. An EF-1 strength tornado can become a EF-5 strength tornado in under a minute. The local NWS gave it a high end EF3 preliminary rating yesterday and they didn't even make it to the worst impacted areas of its path. Mayfield might not be officially rated an EF5, but most enthusiasts/Mets know it was, and given the path length and intensity has to rank as one of the most incredible tornadoes ever documented, arguably the most impressive tornadic event from combined factors since 4/27 (yes, even surpassing Joplin which was extremely intense but had a shorter path) and would have likely beat out the entire Damage falls into EF category -> EF category has known minimum and maximum wind speeds -> Maximum EF category damage rating is known as the EF rating of the tornado -> We know the verifiable max wind speed at the most intense damage point of a tornado, which is the minimum wind speed of the EF rating. The EF scale is pretty bias towards not labeling a tornado an EF5. El Reno was rated properly based on the damage it did. Not every tornado can earn the coveted EF5 rating and go home with the Dorothy Gale Award. If a tornado the size of El Reno came at the right angle it could wipe the entire city off the map. A very good example of this was the Rochelle Ef4 tornado with 200mph winds that swept away a couple homes that were anchor bolted and yet was given a high end Ef4 rating. The Enhanced Fujita Tornado Scale ranks tornados by wind speed; 166-200mph is an EF4, and 201+ mph is an EF5. A:since i look at the same logic with past and present its obvious the F scale over rates tornadoes while the EF scale under rates tornadoes , tons of proof for this with most of all DOW recorded tornadoes being 1 or 2 EF scale rating under rated. and is up there as one of the strongest tornadoes ever. EF4-5 tornadoes make up collectively less than 1% of all tornadoes, and whether it’s a high end EF3 to low end EF4 or an EF5 doesn’t matter when a city is devastated and people’s lives are uprooted. It even says F5+ for Jarrell, which the plus isn’t even possible on the old or new rating system. Some if not almost all of these wind estimates are bullshit. Just rewatched June First’s Mayfield damage assessment video and one of the reasons behind Mayfield not getting an EF5 rating was that a tree nearby a home rated 190mph was virtually untouched by the tornado. Maybe something that combines damage and the radar indicated or actual recorded wind speeds, or just give two different ratings, one based on wind speed and one based on damage. Oh, and of course, you don't know how to play magic or understand the EF rating either. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now Mayfield Tornado Locked post. during the month of December was in 1957. The Mayfield tornado had radar wind speeds in EF5 range, but it was over open fields when It was recorded and there wasn't enough evidence to place the rating. I didn’t recognize the EF scale . Welcome to Canada’s official subreddit! This is the place to engage on all things Canada. The videos of that particular tornado are some of the most shocking I’ve ever seen. 4/26/91 Red Rock Ok tornado for example had 268 mph near the surface, F5 and record intensity at the time, only to be downgraded to an F4 due to the The 2013 El Reno tornado is indisputably an EF5-strength tornado, but as the strongest areas of the tornado didn't hit much of anything, it fell into EF3 on the scale. Remember an EF-1 tornado can still kill you. It’s plain STUPID to rate by damage alone. hearing of victims being dismembered so horrificly that they were confused as being livestock is what keeps up at night the most. I live in Europe in a city of just about 33000 people. I mean the Mayfield Tornado was a long track historic tornado that passed through two population centers, bowled over a factory where workers were threatened if they went to seek shelter, and it was a nocturnal tornado. Deep red: EF-0 (cold air tornado or landspout). and a bit to the south of this spot was a above ground 300 mph proof tornado shelter, the tornado was able to push it and bent it, this is currently the highest unofficial damage di by a tornado with a wind speed measurement, however the oil rig to the north and one damage spot from the smithville EF5 had stronger force per square inch force View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. Some years there are no winners. Avoid memes, storm art, jokes posts, unrelated weather (not tornado), vague questions, duplicates, advertising & perceived spam. Mayfield has been much slower. Go give him a like if you liked it. Stop. In the case of last nights tornadoes, the tragic number of lives lost doesn’t change the factors scientists use to determine wind speed of a tornado. Some of those houses were clearly anchored. The destruction of the UK Research building definitely strikes me as EF5 type damage. Dec 15, 2021 · The Mayfield, Kentucky, tornado has been given a preliminary damage rating of EF-4 with winds that topped 190 mph, the National Weather Service said Wednesday afternoon. In the Vilonia-Mayflower and Mayfield tornadoes there were potential EF5 indicators but nearby contextual damage didn’t align with what would be expected from EF5 winds. it may have 140mph winds and blow away a shed, but if the shed would have disintegrated at 100 mph anyway you don’t have evidence for anything higher). Jarrell fell victim to one of the worst tornados that has hit the United States ever. Jan 28, 2025 · 2018 Tescott Tornado, This large tornado tracked over open fields, which caused EF3 damage to homes, however, several vehicles were thrown 300 yards and were partially mangled, 90% EF5 confidence 2020 Bassfield Tornado, Brief violent damage occurred at and around a well built cabin, grass was scoured from the ground, 90% EF5 confidence Mar 2, 2017 · we can just all agree that the mayfield tornado was an EF-5. Dec 11, 2024 · MAYFIELD — Tuesday marks three years since a catastrophic tornado ripped through parts of western Kentucky, leaving communities forever changed. Furthermore some tornadoes appear to actually do EF-5 damage and still don't get the rating as the application of the EF scale is so strict nowadays - tornadoes like Mayfield KY, Vilonia AR and Rochelle-Fairdale IL spring to mind when talking about storms that arguably should have been assigned an EF-5 rating. i I live about an hour away from Mayfield, I swear I heard the 2021 Mayfield tornado from my house, that night was fucking insane. Note, before 2016 tornadoes that didn’t cause damage were rated EF0 instead of EFU (EF-Unrated). Look at some of the damage out of Bremen. Other years there are multiple contestants. Never 219-316 MPH. A subreddit for those who want to end work, are curious about ending work, want to get the most out of a work-free life, want more information on anti-work ideas and want personal help with their own jobs/work-related struggles. wlky. Here is the EF scale with damage indicators. Also the system in regards to rating a tornado is flawed. Yes, the likelihood of that is incredibly high. But getting to his main thesis, I do think that with the recent Mayfield classification and just how obtuse that rating is, and just the stupidity that El Reno is considered an EF3, the EF Scale should change. The tornadoes that got rated f5 got rated off of that scale, and tornadoes that got ef5 were rated of that scale. What's ironic about that statement is that the NWS Paducah stated that there were multiple areas of - in their opinion - EF5 damage from the Mayfield tornado (especially in Bremen), but that the final rating of EF4 was given anyway because some trees were still standing in areas away from those structures, but on the same property. How many times can people obsess over the rating thing and continually fail to understand the EF rating system ONLY considers structural damage. Yes, which is why there was so much debate about it’s rating leading to the Enhanced Fujitsu scale. Even if a violent tornado observed up close by a DOW with winds at 300 mph isn’t going to get the 5 rating if it doesn’t hit and destroy anything with the construction criteria needed. Wow. There may be a few fringe choices but the f scale and ef scale don't function the same, so asking which ones didn't deserve their rating doesn't make sense. An EF3 seems absurdly low A low rating will be warranted if the structures destroyed are found to have been poorly constructed. Mayflower-Vilonia 2014, Rochelle-Fairdale 2015, Chapman 2016, Bassfield-Soso 2020, and now potentially Mayfield 2021. 200 mph winds are an outlier for any tornado; and also -- there's just not a lot of difference between a tornado with 195 mph winds and a tornado with 200 mph winds. It is undoubtable, however, that the tornado deserved the F5 rating it was awarded. Imo they need a better tornado rating scale anyways, as neither this nor the f scale really tell the whole story about a tornado. Multiple photos show scouring. Mayfield, Vilonia, etc all caused damage that was inconceivable and destroyed whole towns just like Jarrel, Moore, etc 30 votes, 10 comments. In the earthquake discussion community, earthquakes ratings get downgraded from initial measurement. This is a video I found from the content creator High Risk Chris. It’s exceptionally rare to see tornadoes that devastating and deadly. Some of the images of the damage coming out looks like things we’ve seen out of higher end EF4 tornadoes like Mayfield, Rolling Fork and Rochelle-Fairdale. Sometimes it feels like the EF5 rating is being avoided. It more accurately rates construction code and building materials and how they are put together than tornadoes. Prior to Joplin, Hackleburg and Tuscaloosa, the last tornado in the US to claim more than 50 lives was back in 1971. El Rino was and will always be a F-5 no matter where it occurred. The latter of which I think you have to legit be dumb to not think that was an F5. And honestly you could even take it back to 2011. Moreso that for whatever reason the experts basically agreed to up the strictness on the ratings We all know there have been multiple tornadoes as powerful as the EF5/F5’s of the last 50 years that got ranked EF4s. Follow the rules/etiquette listed in sticky post, which is a must. Was looking at damage from the most recent probable EF5 tornadoes — Fairdale, Rolling Fork, and Mayfield. This was part of a tornado outbreak that was strange in that the area where the outbreak happened only had a "slight" risk of severe weather. Here in Bowling Green, the long track EF3 that came up from Tennessee lifted several times. Some buildings in Mayfield have been rebuilt, or have started rebuilding, but not much. 2-4 are all HP supercells, which are common enough, but none of which yield “classic” tornadoes. The highest recorded wind speed of a tornado was 302mph in the 3/5/1999 Bridge Creek, OK tornado. Tornadoes being given too low of a rating are always talked about (Mayfield 2021, El Reno 2013, Franklin 2003, etc. While I'm absolutely fascinated with tornado's ever since I was a kid because of programs like Storm Chasers, I'm glad that we only have to deal with the occasional F0 or F1 tornado. I have surveyed damage from Jarrell to Joplin and Moore, dozens of tornado sites. Related Topics Kentucky Most notably, the Saugatuck Lighthouse, which was completely ripped off its huge steel anchors and subsequently destroyed. I almost wish that instead of assigning an EF-rating and a wind speed, they used color. The tornado left a very discernible ground scour and took the pavement and subpavement off the highway in front of us. It is my opinion that measuring wind speed is rather irrelevant when it comes to assigning a rating to a tornado, short of being able to find a more objective way to measure power as is the case with earthquakes. 4. So the rating only really matters for stats and headlines, unless someone has some sort of bizarre clause in their insurance policy. Oct 14, 2024 · Update: I have begun mapping the entire path of the Mayfield EF5 with the windspeeds I believe it carried. Certainly over the last decade there have been a handful of tornadoes powerful enough to earn a similar rating, which simply didn’t provide the required damage indicators. It's easier for a tornado to completely destroy, for example, a house if the house isn't poorly anchored to the foundation. Little town northwest of Mayfield. theres ~1200 tornadoes a year in america (vast majority in the eastern 2/3 of the country), they travel for an average o 5 ish miles, and tor producing atmospheric conditions in america favor an ENE-NE path. For instance, the NWS gave the 2011 El Reno-Piedmont Tornado an EF5 rating because it sustained EF5 intensity for a decent amount of time on radar and the damage found in Piedmont was either DoD 8/9. New comments cannot be posted. The 2013 El Reno EF3 and the 2021 Kentucky EF4 immediately come to mind as being immensely powerful storms and I’m sure many of you have wondered as well. e. The difference is that for these tornadoes, there either wasn't a DoW measuring, or the radar-indicated winds contradict the actual damage found. All of these were very powerful tornadoes regardless of final ratings. 7 miles from Fulton County to Muhlenberg County in western Kentucky on Friday evening. Think it was both Vilonia and Mayfield. it definitely has not been quiet for violent tornadoes. Also, still ironic that Alferia called out this sub for questioning the Mayfield tornado rating while he questions both Joplin & Jarrell. [2] Is this an instance of the popular phrase “wishing for an ef5” that I’ve heard so much about but have yet to see. The only way we can determine the power of the tornado by having structural engineers evaluate damage and using scientific data on materials, construction methods, etc. If that 300mph beast hits nothing but trees and Pappaw’s tool shed, it’s not going to get rated as a 5. Welcome to the world of tornado ratings since about2014 or so. I just can’t imagine a massive violent tornado destroying everything in its path for over 100 miles (Mayfield being at night is even worse). Conversely an EF-5 tornado can dissipate just as quickly. I’m not going to rate a tornado EF5 from the 1700s based on the report of a random German dude either. There is a LOT of discussion in this subreddit about why a specific tornado "should" have been rated EF-5 (particularly the ones in Tuscaloosa, AL and Mayfield, KY). Hi u/Andy12293, . Insurance companies will try to argue that the damage to the house was not from the tornado, they’ll say it was “straight line winds” or a microburst, basically anything they can to try and save money, that’s why the rating matters in this context, because if the NWS puts a DI value on a house, the owner can use this to their benefit when trying to get a payout from the insurance companies Tornado outbreak sequence of December 18–20, 1957. There have been plenty that were close, and they are mentioned here often: 2013 El Reno, 2014 Mayflower-Vilonia, 2017 Maloye Russia, 2021 Mayfield, amongst others. The tornado passed the two towns and died out not long after. Jerall Texas F5 and Xenia F6 These two speak for themselves 5. A tornado is a tornado, and in all likelyhood a supercell tornado has the power to level your house at some point during its lifecycle, but usually for only a brief period. S. This sub is for discussions about tornadoes and their related phenomena. I woke up to learn that a city just over an hour away got hit like that and it was terrifying, I still have a hard time going to sleep when thunderstorms roll in. The last EF5 tornado to strike the U. 130K subscribers in the tornado community. TORNADOES SHOULD BE RATED BY WINDSPEED, not damage. People have claimed that the Storm Prediction Center has a bias against awarding the coveted EF-5 prize, but the SPC replied that the prize is given only to the biggest, strongest and most deserving tornadoes, and the Tuscaloosa and Mayfield tornadoes simply did not make the cut. It’s been 10 years since we’ve had an EF-5, but multiples of these “close calls” (Mayfield, this Rolling Fork tornado) recently with damage in certain areas nearly identical looking to historical events that did get the EF-5 rating like Joplin. Its damage was on par with the Tornado that hit Mayfield in 2021, with plenty of similar buildings collapsed or partially swept away. Although in reality there has only been a handful of contenders since the last EF5, the closest being the Quad State/Mayfield tornado, which is still occassionally questioned on if it should've been given an EF5 rating. This is a map I made that shows the highest officially rated tornado on the EF-scale to hit each county in the United States. Oct 18, 2015 · The Western Ky (Mayfield tornado) was more than likely an EF5 especially in the Princeton- Dawson Springs- Earlington- to Bremen segment of the path. The Bowling Green Tornado will likely receive an EF4 rating as well as Monette, Arkansas twister. If you’re going for “classic”, your only choice in this list is choice 1, since I think of the “flying eagle” core which is most common for non-HP super cells. The data includes tornadoes from Feb 1, 2007 to Dec 31, 2023. The super long track tornadoes or the ones hanging out for over an hour are even harder to quantify! When tornadoes end up not hitting well built structures, the EF rating really does takes a dive and make the El Reno’s of the world look like they were shafted, but the rating can’t lie and say it would have obliterated a well built home. The tornado then crossed into Todd County where mostly tree damage and damage to farm/outbuildings were observed. When Ted Fujita and the like were around, were Tornado ratings perfectly accurate and there were no problems at all with how they were rated? Question It seems like the only thing people do on this sub is complain about the EF-Scale so I was wondering if the past was as Utopian for proper tornado ratings as I’m lead it might’ve been People get way too hung up on mythological tornadoes (like El Reno or Mayfield) not being EF5s. I agree, regardless of the final rating, the Greenfield tornado will be one talked about for quite some time and mentioned years down the road in the same breath as other notable tornadoes from the 2010s & 2020s. As others mentioned, the EF scale is explicitly a damage scale, and you basically can only rate a tornado the minimum possible intensity that could have caused the damage done (I. during the month of December was during the Christmas Outbreak of December 2015. Elie Manitoba received an F5 rating while it was essentially a rope, there have been massive mile+ wide tornadoes that had Dominator or probes inside confirming winds that were only in the EF1-2 range. Europe has never produced a tornado remotely as powerful as Moore, Phil-Campbell, Smithville, Mayfield, etc. Every town it hit didn't represent that level of damage. When Tim Samaras and his group were killed in the El Reno tornado after the parent tornado expanded suddenly to over two miles wide, and sent out a satellite tornado -- I knew exactly what had happened. But if the historical accounts are accurate, there can be little doubt and it was likely stronger than the Mayfield tornado. Comparing to the Greenfield it’s likely this tornado won’t be rated higher than “high EF4”. Lying. The tornado quite literally left no damage indicators with which to judge higher winds. The tornado received a maximum rating of EF2 in Christian County and EF1 in Todd County, and 4 people were injured. Video of the tornado also shows extremely violent rotation comparable to other F5 tornadoes. Q:is there any tornado that isn't rated EF5 that you think should 100% be one? A:only one the My predictions are that the Mayfield Tornado will receive an EF5 rating. I’m not really sure what you’re trying to ask, unless you didn’t know that there was an EF5 rating. There's a reason ratings debates and controversies have been so frequent. It's very likely we've seen EF5 tornadoes but due to them not impacting structures during those times they didn't receive the rating. Debris was falling out in a 20x30 mile area ahead of the storm, lighter debris will obviously be lofted for a longer time and can be carried insane distances. And I am experiencing these storms right now. 131K subscribers in the tornado community. That was an EF5 tornado. the only real comparison to this tornado i have is Joplin, and thats due to the extreme destruction it caused to the area. Don't expect a discussion, you're either wrong or you're right. They have underestimated tornado strength if anything. There are also some conspiracy theories implying that the National Weather Service is not going to assign an EF-5 rating to any tornado. The realistic difference between 190 and 200 mph is basically nothing. ), but what… Skip to main content Open menu Open navigation Go to Reddit Home Tornadoes like Rolling Fork, Mayfield and Matador ARE NOT on the same level of strength as monsters like Joplin, Jarrel, Andover or any other tornado from the 2011 outbreak. 142K subscribers in the tornado community. Please be respectful of each other when posting, and note that users new to the subreddit might experience posting limitations until they become more active and longer members of the community. . The tornado then lifted just before impacting the city of Elkton where straight-line winds became dominant. Some people theorize that rating downgrades are to keep the population from panicking from the idea that things are getting worse out there. This structure was bolted to these anchor pilings and concrete with 1-½" bolts, some of which were sheared off. The closest we've had to a tornado getting an EF5 since the last one way back in 2013 is the Quad State/Mayfield tornado as it did have some markers for an The idea that we have not had a tornado rated as such in a decade makes me wonder which is true that we have been very fortunate and tornadoes have generally been slightly weaker in the previous 10 years that we may have been rating tornadoes EF-5 more leniently in the past. There were no well-built structures in its path. On December 18–20, 1957, a significant tornado outbreak sequence affected the southern Midwest and the South of the contiguous United States. Multiple cases of High End EF4 or "almost EF5" tornadoes these past 8 years. With tornadoes, it's best to treat every suspected/confirmed tornado as equally dangerous until the danger has passed. Essentially this. But every single time a stronger f3+ tornado hits outside of standard tornado Alley, you can always count on a slew of misinformed articles about tornado Alley shifting and getting stronger tornadoes. That being said, some of the tornadoes over the last couple of days have certainly been among the highest echelons of tornadoes. still, though, what's important is the humanitarian impact. Exceptionally rare, these tornadoes can produce wind speeds higher than 200 mph. 202 votes, 29 comments. 2-4 weren’t particularly visible (although Tuscaloosa was for awhile, admittedly) and it’s pretty obvious why looking at It followed a very similar path to the Mayfield tornado. nppg clnb amnyo elopbmzd mmb ykhlyf ruqactqs ouck wwbf bfncxci tjtmvxv bgefc yonqbti jeim tpyvndjf